Nurturing Science

 CBBL, Group, Teaching  Comments Off
Sep 082010
 

Coming back from vacations is never easy, and it is even worst in science. A lot of project proposals and articles to be written and conferences to be improved piled up in your laptop and you did not have the time to finnish even half of them. What is worst, that turn in your research you wanted time to think about didn’t come out as expected. Indeed, taking strong and deeply thought decisions is not an easy task while supervising your 6 to 11 years old kids in a rocky beach in the Costa Brava, climbing a Pyrenees mountain or enjoying a foam party in Vilamaniscle.

So fresh air is always welcome and I found it (as most good science) by chance at Uri Alon’s site. Afterwards (as happens also with most good science, unfortunately…) I realized his paper on “How to Choose a Good Scientific Problem” was extremely highly read. His “Materials for Nurturing Science” have started producing in me a similar effect as the reading of some Feynman’s lectures produced years ago, when a PhD student in Lluch’s and González-Lafont lab. Pessimistic views were (and periodically are) collapsing into what Alon refers as “the cloud”. But some readings and talks (veeeery few) lead us again to the right track, the one that was not initially drawn into our particular history. The wall, that I call sometimes (sorry, link in catalan). At any rate, spending some time having a look at Uri’s “Materials…” is an excellent therapy for the type of people that always reject any type of therapy: scientists…

Anyway, I think reading Uri’s paper and having some time to see his videos is an excellent start for any new PhD student or postdoctoral researcher in my lab, so here are the links for you, if you are thinking on spending the best years of your scientific career (and who knows if also of your life) at the CBBL.

May 032010
 

“Argument and debate are common in science, yet they are virtually absent from science education. Recent research shows, however, that opportunities for students to engage in collaborative discourse and argumentation offer a means of enhancing student conceptual understanding and students’ skills and capabilities with scientific reasoning. As one of the hallmarks of the scientist is critical, rational skepticism, the lack of opportunities to develop the ability to reason and argue scientifically would appear to be a significant weakness in contemporary educational practice. In short, knowing what is wrong matters as much as knowing what is right. This paper presents a summary of the main features of this body of research and discusses its implications for the teaching and learning of science.”
Jonathan Osborne

These are words taken from the abstract of one of the articles devoted to Science, Language and Literacy in the special issue of Science Magazine. An unavoidable reading for all those engaged on teaching science, but not just that…

 

Proper project design, management and exploitation are key recipes for success in both science and business. Learning from strategies in the latter environment we can give us new visions on how to propose succesful research projects. This, eventually, will lead to better technology transfer and to a real improve on the society perception of science and on its impact in daily life economy. Within the framework of the MSc on Bioinformatics for Health Sciences we thought, some years ago, that adding a course on project management would be an excellent training for our students, with the perspective to make them aware of the role the society expects researchers to take, beyond the (extremely needed) basic science knowledge.

As the course has a wider scope than just for MSc students, we decided to propose the course as an external activity in which the MSc students are invited to attend.

The new 2010 edition of the course is organized by the GRIB, and it is available for registration and, following the experience of previous years is, doubtless, worth reserving some hours in our busy agenda to attend this extremely interesting and practical course.

 

The new CBBL site is designed to provide easier acces to information and in a more dynamical way. After having developed group web sites since my PhD time in the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, I have gone through the more or less standard process for a (semi-)advanced user: raw HTML pages, small CGI scripting, PHP/MySQL, Plone and…. coming back to a more reasonable approach using the WordPress PHPH/MySQL based system. I am quite happy with this new approach, as it allows concentrating on the content and not on the technicalities. We’ll see how long it takes to get sick of it, a quite common feature of this who writes.

Using the Blog capabilities of the new CBBL site, I’ll try to make a sense of my view of understanding research when other duties allow me to spend some minutes here. As publicly paid staff, researchers are not free to deliver results in the pace and with the global interest we wish, but the ones that the society deserves. In my view, in the same way we are eager to push ourselves to publish more and better every day, such publications should carry information not just important for our ego, but for the society as a whole. That is why we feel sad when a given article, in which we put so much efforts for so long, is after publication forgotten in a obscure library, be analogical or digital. The interest in publishing with high impact should not be seen as an end by itself, but the constant checking of the pace our publications are quoted by others and influence their work is critical.

Research, however, is “just” one of the three legs of our work as teaching staff in public institutions. The other two, teaching and technology transfer, are at least at the same level, in my view. Thus, the CBBL participates with interest in the teaching of several courses and in transferring technology to the commercial world, in order to give back to the society part of the resources we receive.

Last, but not least, researchers are requested to be critical in any part of their work, with themselves and with others. I’ll try not to betray this maxima and be as caustic as politeness allow. Unfortunately, my English is not as good as my native language Catalan and my Spanish, so other non-scientific opinions will be sent to other personal blogs as well, leaving this for issues related to my professional task.

By now, enjoy reading our production and get involved in those areas of the web site that allow such interaction.

As Catalonia is a welcoming country, this blog is also a welcoming blackboard for opinions related to research. Welcome to your home.

© 2012 CBBL at GRIB-IMIM/UPF Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
go to ajlee